Introduction


The rapid increase of terrorism and the high rhythms of criminality in recent years have activated the governments around the world to protect the society from each structure of threat. Obviously citizens, who live in countries with a very high criminality and with a lot of danger for terrorism attacks such as United Kingdom or United States of America, especially need help of technology and science to leave with more protection. After the terrorist attacks in London and in New York, the governments of both sides want to secure the daily life with technological realisations which can be finding in every public or private place. Many citizens believe that is safer for them if their governments used the technology to keep an eye on people life.
Can it be argued that technology and science are two important functions which protect our life from the treats of the inside and outside environment such as criminals and terrorist? Many people say that, it is better to have a high measure of protection sacrifice some of our personal freedom but we are living with safety. On the other hand many people argued that this measure is for the society the end of the modern democracy. This essay will consider both sides of arguments for the breaches of our personal privacy with the use of technology and science to fight crime.

However, many people believe that the use of technology and science to fight crime is a very helpful process, for their protection against terrorism and crime. Government’s use technology and science to protect our life on a daily basis. And this process is very significant for people who live in countries with an elevated percent of criminality and terrorism threats. Consequently citizens they have many reasons to consent in the use of technological and science realisations, such as the use of the Closed-Circuit Television system (CCTV) in public places and the maintenance base of DNA data for previous criminals.

Paragraph 2: First disadvantage (The unjustifiable use of technology in everyday life increase rapidly. The authorities monitoring every moment of the public life)

Paragraph 3: Second disadvantage (The use of technological and science realisation to surveillance the society such as internet – mail – phones – mobile phones)

Paragraph 4: Third disadvantage (The secret anointment could be dangerous for the personal freedom)

Conclusion: Sometimes the society needs the protection of the technology and science. However in the same time we need to keep some of the essential functions of our freedom which are very important for our life.